Relativity skeptics
This page has links to articles and websites questioning Einstein's theory of relativity (SR and GR)

pdf files require Adobe Acrobat Reader or other pdf reader to view - free download here http://www.adobe.com

The ephysics.fileave.com files can also be found in the physics folder at my 4shared.com account here in case the fileden.com account exceeds the 24 hour download limit

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Louis Essen, D.Sc., F.R.S., has spent a lifetime working at the NPL on the measurement of time and frequency. He built the first caesium clock in 1955 and determined the velocity of light by cavity resonator, in the process showing that Michelson's value was 17km/s low. In 1959, he was awarded the Popov Gold Medal of the USSR Academy of Sciences and also the OBE.

Essen says that Einstein's theory of relativity is full of flaws and logical inconsistancies. Check out his 1978 article in Wireless World here:
http://www.filesnack.com/files/cdtnw5ic

His article "RELATIVITY - joke or swindle?" in Electronics & Wireless World, p. 126-127, February 1988 is here http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/Essen-L.htm

The reference listed at the bottom of this article here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Essen
Essen, L. (1971) The Special Theory of Relativity: A Critical Analysis, Oxford University Press (Oxford science research papers, 5). , booklet in which he questioned the modern interpretation of the special theory of relativity.
has been uploaded here: http://www.filesnack.com/files/ctpioas9
(for large pdf files its best to download them by right clicking on the link, click save "target as", or "save file as" depending on the browser, and then viewing after the file has been downloaded)
(if the 24 hr account limit is exceeded try again later, alternatively, you can download a copy of the article from the physics/Essen folder here: http://www.4shared.com/dir/2077108/ab6c3d06/sharing.html)

More about Essen http://www.btinternet.com/~time.lord (works best in Internet Explorer)

Essen's views on Relativity http://www.btinternet.com/~time.lord/Relativity.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michelson-Morley-Miller The Coverup
21st Century Science & Technology
link to The Coverup

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Historical Papers. Note Builder's solution.

1. Geoffrey Builder (1957) Ether and Relativity.

http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Historical_Papers.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is wrong with relativity?
by G. BURNISTON BROWN

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/academ/whatswrongwithrelativity.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Einstein's Allies and Enemies: Debating Relativity in Germany, 1916-1920
by David E. Rowe
Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science vol. 251

This is an excellent article. It discusses anti-relativists in Germany in 1916-1920. One of them, Ernst Gehrcke gives evidence that Einstein stole Paul Gerber's work from 1898 by showing that "Gerber had obtained precisely the same formula Einstein had derived using general relativity" and the fact that "Gerber's publication is discussed in Mach's Mechanik (Mach, 1904, 201), and Einstein demonstrated his precise knowledge of the contents of this well-known book in his recent obiturary of Mach" (see pages 245-246 of the article).

http://www.filesnack.com/files/ctn5r0am

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Herbert Dingle was correct by Harry Ricker
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/8/24/2063601/physics/ricker11-HerbertDingleWasCorrect.pdf (158 KB)


You can download a copy of Dingle's book "Science at the Crossroads" here
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/02/challenging_einsteins_special.html

Must read arguments against relativity by modern professors, engineers and others
http://www.cartesio-episteme.net/quest.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In his 1951 article in Nature, Paul Dirac discusses a prefered frame of reference, applies quantum mechanics to the aether and says "with the new theory of electrodynamics we are rather forced to have an aether". From various writing of his it appears that Dirac doesn't seem to see the aether theory and Einstein´┐Żs relativity theory as in conflict with each other.

You can download a copy of the article here
http://www.filesnack.com/files/ctnqt2wl (210 KB)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One of E. W. Silvertooth's articles appears in Electronics and Wireless World May 1989 and gives the earth's velocity in one experiment as 378 km/s towards the constellation of Leo.

Here's the article.

http://www.filesnack.com/files/cdul70qi

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Download Santilli's book here for free
Il Grande Grido: Ethical probe on Einsten Follower's in USA
http://www.telesio-galilei.com/ilgrandegridoedfig.pdf

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stefan Marinov is a skeptic of Einstein's relativity theory and claims to have performed experiments showing the anisotropy of the velocity of light.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Marinov

http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf041/sf041p18.htm

Download Marinov's book here for free
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/books.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The physics textbook that I used at the University of Maryland claimed that the Ives Stillwell experiment supported Einstein's theory of Relativity. I was surprised to find an article in a 1938 issue of Electronics which claims it supports the aether theory. I looked at a lot of Herbert Ives' papers in the Journal of the Optical Society of America and found that he always uses the term Larmor-Lorentz theory, but never mention's Einstein's theory. Ives is known to be a supporter of the aether theory.

One interpretation of the Ives Stillwell Experiment

Electronics June 1938 page 13
Electronics June 1938 page 14
Electronics June 1938 page 15

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I found this interesting email here http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/16133.htm

The Deception Deepens. Falsification of experimental results relating to the Theory of Relativity.

From Al Kelly to Ivor Catt.

Hi Ivor,

I am just satisfied that I published in detail the 'cooked' results of H
& K in 1996 in Monograph No 3 of the Institution of Engineers of Ireland.
Anything I emailed to you and others really is describing what is in that
paper. A later paper on the same subject which will reach a wider
audience is coming out in Phys Ess. in Dec 2000 (in press and late) .
Quoting any emails I sent to you would merely prolong the site you are
forming. The abstract I sent to you of the Phys Ess. paper would be
enough for the reader I suggest.

I repeat it here :-

Abstract. The original test results were not published by Hafele &
Keating. In their famous 1972 paper; they published figures that were
radically different from the actual test results which are here published
for the first time. An analysis of the real data shows that no credence
can be given to the conclusions of Hafele & Keating.
Good Hunting,

Al Kelly, 10june01

----- Original Message -----

From: ic <ic@electromagnetism.demon.co.uk>

To: > <ivorcatt@electromagnetism.demon.co.uk>

Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 12:06 AM

Subject: draft es/rel scandal


The reference is on
www.btinternet.com/~time.lord in the bibliography. It
is: Atomic Clocks Coming and Going, Creation Research Society Quarterly, 14, 46 (1977)

----- Original Message -----

From: Ivor Catt <ivorcatt@electromagnetism.demon.co.uk

To: Al Kelly <agkelly@eircom.net>; mikegi <mikegi@prestige.net>
Cc: Malcolm Davidson <
malcolm_davidson@sonymusic.com>;
<
ray.essen@btinternet.com>; <dave@dunelmsystems.co.uk>; James Bogle
<
bogles@bogletowers.fsnet.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:42 PM Subject: essen/rel
Al Kelly (et al),

This is the kind of thing I intend to put on my website. Please help me.
Ivor Catt 6june01

The Deception Deepens

"'I see nobody on the road,' said Alice.

'I only wish I had such eyes,' the king remarked in a fretful tone. 'To be
able to see Nobody! And at that distance, too! Why, it's as much as I can
do to see real people, by this light!'"

"Pathological science often depends on experiments at the threshold of
detectability, or at the lowest margins of statistical significance. The
claims frequently emerge from a body of data that is selectively
incomplete;
wishful researchers unconsciously discard enough 'bad' data to make the
remaining 'good' points look important. That the measurements are at the
very threshold of sensitivity is an advantage, not an obstacle: data that
don't fit the theory are explained away; those they fit are lovingly
retained. - Peter Huber, "Galileo's Revenge", 1991, p27.

"No one has attempted to refute my arguments, but I was warned that if I
persisted I was likely to spoil my career prospects. .... .... the
continued acceptance and teaching of relativity hinders the development of a
rational extension of electromagnetic theory." - Louis Essen F.R.S., "Relativity and time signals", Wireless World, oct78, p44.

"The authors then proceed to make a statistical analysis of the frequency
comparisons made between the clocks, to obtain their final results. No
details of these comparisons are given, but the analysis is based on the
assumption that the frequency variations are random in nature, which
appears to be unlikely and is not in accord with my own experience.... the
experimental results given in their paper do not support these
predictons." - Louis Essen, "Atomic Clocks Coming and Going", Creation Research Society
Quarterly, 14, 46 (1977)


"Most people (myself included) would be reluctant to agree that the time
gained by any one of these clocks is indicative of anything .... the
difference between theory and experiment is disturbing."
- Hafele, Secret United States Navval Observatory internal report, 1971.
Obtained by A G Kelly two decades later under the Freedom of Information
Act.

In my article "The Conquest of Truth", Electronics and Wireless World,
jan98, I point out that all four so-called acid tests of the validity of
the Theory of Relativity are disputed. This article summarises a continuing
deception practised by the Establishment including the journal "Nature" on
a later much vaunted experiment.

The theory of Relativity states that increased velocity causes clocks to
slow down. Two aeroplanes carrying the world's most accurate were flown around the world in opposite directions, and then compared with each other and with a stationary clock. The experimental results were then falsified, and Nature and other journals wrongly concluded that Relativity had been experimentally verified. Louis Essen, who became Fellow of the
Royal Society in honour of his achievement in developing these (caesium)
clocks, was prevented from publishing his caveat, that the clocks were
less accurate than claimed.

Decades later, under the Freedom of Information Act, Dr. A G Kelly obtained the raw data from the experiments, which showed that the wrong conclusion had been published. Further, he obtained an internal memo by one of the authors a year earlier, when the author had written that the experiment could not lead to any valid conclusions.

Ivor Catt 8june01

Will the new editor of Nature now belatedly publish this information? - IC.

Cc Nature (Editor: Philip Campbell) via feedback@nature.com 12june01

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Farce of Physics by Bryan G. Wallace

This book discusses experiments which show inconsistencies in interplanetary radar data, how they conflict with Einstein's relativity theory and the suppression of this and other publications by the establishment.

Table of contents here http://www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de/2013/02/the-farce-of-physics-2/


Note the part here in the "Relativity Revolution" chapter:

"Two scientists were dismissed because they discovered some facts which contradicted Einstein. It is not only dangerous to speak against Einstein, but which is worse it is impossible to publish anything which might be considered as contradiction to his theory."

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/FP_C6_RR.HTM

Bryan G. Wallace's paper from Spectroscopy Letters 1969 pages 361-367
The constancy of the speed of light is one of the main postulates of Special Relativity.
SpecLetters1969-p361-367.pdf

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You can find more articles in the physics folder here
http://www.4shared.com/dir/2077108/ab6c3d06/sharing.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Progress in Space-Time Physics 1987
Edited by James Paul Wesley

A review of the book from Foundations of Physics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1989
http://www.filesnack.com/files/ctjehw4s

Progress in Space-Time Physics preface to page 35
http://www.filesnack.com/files/cdcszqe5

pages 269-273 Book Review
Einstein's Relativity the Greatest Fallacy in the Twentieth Century
by Sharad D. Tipnis
http://www.filesnack.com/files/ct9yu46a

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Roland DeWitte

DeWitte's experiment demonstrates the anisotropy of light in the earth's frame of reference contradicting SRT.


http://www.teslaphysics.com/DeWitte/belgacom.htm

http://www.teslaphysics.com/DeWitte/index.htm

http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2006/PP-06-11.PDF

http://uk.geocities.com/kevinharkess/reasons_einstein_wrong/reasons_einstein_wrong.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More links

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/fremde-abhandlungen.html

http://www.markweger.at/oppon.html


Some anti-relativity forums

http://www.anti-relativity.com/forum/index.php

http://www.network54.com/Forum/304711/

http://18040.rapidforum.com/

You can use Babelfish for translating the German in the last forum
http://babelfish.altavista.com/tr